gateway_template
 
gold curved corner
KACC logo rice and wheat on horizon
gold curved corner
KACC Home Kansas China Japan Korea
Agricultural
Products
Trade
History
Food
Cultural
Expression
Interviews: Authentic Voices
Resources
About Us logo and link to about us page
 


Authentic Voices:
Conversations on Food and Agriculture

 
Professor Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney

Food for Thought: On Rice, Beef, Nature, Food Safety, and McDonald’s in Japan

Interview with Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney
William F. Vilas Research Professor of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

By Norma Sakamoto-Larzalere
March 12, 2004

 

Professor Emiko Ohnuki-Tierney is a William F. Vilas Research Professor of Anthropology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. An expert in the social, cultural, and symbolic anthropology of Japan, she earned her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is the author of 12 books in English and Japanese, including “Illness and Culture in Contemporary Japan: An Anthropological View” (1984), “The Monkey as Mirror: Symbolic Transformations in Japanese History and Ritual” (1987), “Rice as Self: Japanese Identities Through Time” (1993), and “Kamikaze, Cherry Blossoms, and Nationalisms: the Militarization of Aesthetics in Japanese History” (2002). Professor Ohnuki-Tierney has been awarded the Guggenheim, National Endowment for the Humanities, and Japan Foundation fellowships, and is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

1. Background

2. Significance of Rice and other Foods in Japan

3. Concept of Nature and what is Natural in Japanese Foods

4. Food Safety in Japan

5. McDonald’s and Changing Table Manners in Japan

6. Globalism and the Japan/United States Food Market

7. Concluding Thoughts

Food Safety in Japan

L: Another food issue that’s been in the news is the food safety issue in Japan. And with the problems of hygiene and Mad Cow Disease [BSE] outbreak in Japan, Canada, and the U. S., in your opinion do you believe the average Japanese consumer is concerned about food safety?

OT: They get terribly concerned about imported food. But they are much less guarded when it comes to the domestic agricultural products that do have chemicals in them—but somehow the consumers don’t get much information about these products—so they are not as cautious about it. But when it comes to imported products, in many societies, they are far more guarded.

For example, beef, after all, only started to be eaten in the Meiji period. The emperor in fact encouraged the Japanese to eat meat. There was a great deal of discussion on beef eating and associating it with Western Enlightenment. That started in Meiji—but the consumption has not been that great. Meat still is a kind of foreign element—and so when Mad Cow Disease and all of that comes out, people jump. Some of the native foods could be just as dangerous but the Japanese are not as cautious about that.

L: Mad Cow Disease was discovered in Japanese meat as well—

OT: Yes, that’s right.

L: Is the packaging and labeling of the origin of food products important in the consumer market?

OT: Yes—they do look especially when it comes to imported food products especially foreign introduced food such as cheese, milk, and yogurt. They [markets] all mark where they come from. The food industry [in Japan] tried to promote the consumption by, for example, talking about such things as the beautiful nature of Alaska and Norway. Now, they are concerned about farmed fish. And when they try to increase the consumption of dairy foods such as milk and cheese, they always depict pristine nature and the mountains of Hokkaido.

L: As part of the food industry’s marketing strategies?

OT: Yes, that’s right. That’s not always translated into the real purity of the food.

L: But it was an ideal image to promote the purity of certain kinds of foods. And in relation to this purity of food, there are the Japanese concepts of uchi (inside) and soto (outside). How do these concepts relate to the purity of food?

OT: That I think relates to basic hygienic—in other words—the Americans don’t mind having dogs go out and come back in the house—the middle-class Japanese are very conscious about taking their shoes off, washing their hands, and even gargling after they come back from outside.

Uchi/soto has been a little too stereotyped by outsiders and also tatemae/honne [outwardly expressed feelings/true feelings] has been absolutely stereotyped since Americans have that too.

L: It exists just as much in American life—

OT: Absolutely—you have this all the time in politics, at the national level and the governmental level. These concepts are attributed as though they were unique to the Japanese.

L: I suppose another way is to see things such as rice as pure as opposed to foreign things that may be impure such as meat—

OT: It’s not that something is just impure—it’s when something happens suddenly it can acquire an impurity far more readily.

L: In what way?

OT: Well, for example, when the Mad Cow Disease comes, then suddenly the Japanese think of beef as impure. Although on the other hand, beef has been thought of as a source of Enlightenment, a source of energy--like urban centers everywhere, there are double sides, right?

L: Do people now think of beef in the historical sense, when it was against the Buddhist teachings and it was taboo to eat meat and butchers were "outcastes?"

OT: I don’t think so—that is the intriguing part—at that time [during the Meiji period] the butcher stores were always in marginalized areas such as across the Sumida River. And attributed to the former outcastes, but that notion of impurity disappeared fairly radically.

L: What about bread?

OT: Bread is an intriguing food because it came to Japan very early—and like my hometown of Kobe—they have excellent bakeries. They distinguish among types of bread-- German bread, and French bread—some would drive for hours to get bread from a very famous bakery. But bread is always a breakfast food—or lunch food. It did not replace [rice] for dinner.

L: Yes, the Japanese miss rice for dinner. You mentioned about cat burgers in one of your articles—that there were rumors circulating about burgers made from cat meat at McDonald’s—why do you think these rumors circulated about these foreign foods?

OT: Whatever comes from outside is welcomed on one hand, and there is the other side that lurks behind it—the negative things such as Mad Cow Disease or stories about cat burgers or epidemics that are attributed to foreign things. Things that are foreign are a source of Enlightenment, and at the same time, the sinister side is lurking behind.

Interestingly, McDonald’s started to target the busiest places such as very busy [train] stations or at the Ginza, whereas, Mos Burgers [Japanized fast food] targeted the younger population and the university areas.

Next: McDonald’s and Changing Table Manners in Japan