| U.S.–Japan
Bilateral Trade—Japan exports motor vehicles,
semiconductors, office equipment, and chemicals and imports
machinery and equipment, fuels, foodstuffs, and other
products. As Japan’s largest trading partner, the
United States absorbs over 30 percent of Japan’s
exports and provides over 19 percent of Japan’s
imports. Japan is the largest market for U.S. agricultural
exports, importing feed and feedgrains, beef, wheat and
flour, fruit, processed foods, and other agricultural
products (World Factbook 2003).
U.S.–Japan Beef Trade—Japan
is the top importer of U.S. beef. In 2001, Japan absorbed
40 percent of total U.S. beef and beef variety meat
exports on a volume basis and 48 percent on a value
basis. Following the discovery of BSE (bovine spongiform
encephalopathy) in Japan in September 2001, beef consumption
plummeted and U.S. beef exports to Japan dropped. U.S.
total beef exports to Japan fell more than 6 percent
in volume from 2000 to 2001. In 2002, only 27 percent
of U.S. beef exports by volume went to Japan, and Mexico
became the largest importer of U.S. beef by volume,
although Japan remained the top importer by value. Consumption
of beef and demand for imports are expected to recover
in 2003 as concerns over the safety of beef are alleviated.
USMEF statistics for the first five months of 2003 indicated
a 9 percent increase in volume and a 30 percent increase
in value of U.S. beef exports to Japan and once again
listed Japan as the leading market for U.S. beef. A
recovery in import levels, however, may trigger higher
import tariffs (see trade policy issues below), slowing
growth by raising prices of imported beef (USMEF 2003g).
Market Share—In
2002, the United States was one of two major exporters
of beef to Japan, competing primarily with Australia.
Prior to the incidence of BSE in Japanese cattle in
2001, imports of fresh/chilled, frozen, and processed
beef in 2000 totaled 740,592 metric tons (approx.814,651
U.S. tons). These levels declined to 495,660 metric
tons (approx. 545,232 U.S. tons) in 2002. The primary
beef export from the United States was frozen beef at
137,020 metric tons (approx. 150,722 U.S. tons). The
United States was the top exporter in that category,
followed by Australia at 92,115 metric tons (approx.
101,326 U.S. tons). The ranking of the two countries
was reversed in the export of fresh/chilled beef, with
Australia leading at 138,385 metric tons (approx. 152,223
U.S. tons) and the United States in second at 89,480
metric tons (approx. 98,942 U.S. tons). The United States
and Australia also accounted for about three-quarters
of the relatively small amount of processed beef imported
by Japan in 2002. From 1995 through 2002, the overall
U.S. market share in Japan of fresh/chilled, frozen
and processed imports has been steady, fluctuating between
46 and 49 per cent (USDA/FAS 2002g).
"Desire Beef" Campaign—In
March 2002, the U.S. Meat Export Federation (2002a)
launched a campaign in Japan to “deliver messages
of safety, taste and nutrition directly to the Japanese
consumers,” with three American wives and mothers
as spokespersons. The campaign followed the discovery
of BSE in Japanese cattle in September 2001, and the
subsequent drop in Japanese consumption of “30
to 50 percent at both retail and restaurant levels.”
Sales of U.S. exporters in the first quarter were down
as well by 30 to 35 percent from a year earlier. The
full-scale campaign was to run in newspapers in March
and April 2002, in women’s magazines from April
through June, and on television from April through September.
The targeted group was “moms and children living
at home.” The campaign was called “Aisareru
beef” [desire beef] (USMEF 2002a).
In August 2002 (USMEF 2002b), Yu Hayami, a wife, mother
and celebrity, became the spokesperson in Japan for
the campaign to carry the message “woman-to-woman.”
Part of the campaign also included the publication of
98-page color cookbook, “American Beef Cooking:
Yu Hayami’s Party Recipes and Daily Menu,”
which sold for about US$7.50 and was available at more
than 3,000 bookstores in Japan. The “aisareru”
campaign was expected to continue beyond September 2002
into 2003, but at lower budget levels, and with more
focus on public relations, in-store promotions and special
events (USMEF 2002c).
Trade Policy Issues—Beef
trade policies have at times been the subject of disagreement
between Japan and the United States. Prior to 1978,
when the USMEF opened an office in Tokyo, only about
10,000 metric tons (approx. 11,000 U.S. tons) of beef
per year were being shipped from the United States to
Japan, due to quota limits (Longworth 1983:48-49). In
1988, the United States and Japan signed a trade agreement
in which Japan agreed to eliminate quotas and reduce
tariffs on beef beginning in 1991. By 2000, U.S. beef
exports to Japan peaked at approximately 360,000 metric
tons (approx. 396,000 U.S. tons) before dropping in
2001 after the discovery of bovine spongiform encephalopathy
(BSE) in Japan.
To protect Japanese domestic producers, the 1988 trade
agreement included a safeguard “snapback”
provision. If imports increase more than 17 percent
over the same period in the previous year, the tariff
on beef imported to Japan will increase from 38.5 percent
to 50 percent for the remainder of the year. Due to
the dramatic decrease in beef imports during 2002, import
levels in 2003 may trigger this “snapback.”
The Japanese government has already implemented the
safeguard tariff measures for chilled beef as of August
1, 2003 (FAS 2003). Tariffs for frozen beef have remained
at the normal level. Both beef industry representatives
from the United States and the hotel and restaurant
industry in Japan have protested against this policy,
arguing that the current situation is exceptional and
should not be handled as the type of import surge the
snapback provisions were designed to address. The protocol
does not include offal, which constitutes a large part
of the U.S. export market of beef to Japan and would
not be affected by the increase in tariff (FAS 2003b;
National Cattlemen’s Beef Association: March/April
2003:20).
A current issue of concern between the United States
and Japan is the worldwide discussion on the traceability
of livestock from origin to sale. In the United States,
the 2002 farm bill (Farm Security and Rural Investment
Act of 2002) established mandatory country-of-origin
labeling (COOL) on beef, pork, lamb, fish, peanuts,
and other products, to be implemented nationwide on
September 20, 2004. Under COOL requirements, only beef
from cattle born, raised, and processed in the United
States can be labeled "Product of USA." The
COOL requirement in the 2002 Farm Bill excluded beef
exports, as well as food service establishments, small
retailers, and processed meat products (Rosson and Adcock
2003).
While the benefits and costs of implementing COOL for
domestic sales continue to be debated in the United
States, labeling the origin of beef products for export
acquired intensified urgency after the discovery of
a case of BSE in a cow in Alberta, Canada, in May 2003.
Japan immediately banned the import of beef and cattle
from Canada, and the United States and other countries
quickly followed. Due to the significant number of cattle
from Canada already in the United States, the Japanese
expressed great concern that beef imported from the
United States might include Canadian beef. While Japan
had already implemented a place-of-origin labeling requirement
for retail beef in 2000, the requirement included exceptions
such as sales in the food service industry (Peterson
2002:1,16). Subsequent to the ban on Canadian beef,
the Japanese government ruled that, as of September
1, 2003, all beef imported to Japan must include country-of-origin
certification. In response, the USDA established the
Beef Verification Program (BEV), which was formally
accepted by Japan for the certification of fresh meat
products. The program entails strict audits of U.S.
beef exporters to ensure that all beef certified for
export to Japan is from U.S. cattle. Beef exporters
must maintain records on the origins of all beef for
export to Japan. The program may also be extended to
beef exports to Korea in the near future (Forbes 2003).
|
 |
Kansas beef on sale in Osaka,
Japan, under sign reading "Beef from KANSAS."
photo courtesy of U. Minnesota LCTL virtual
photo album |
Kansas–Japan Agricultural
Trade—Agricultural products figure prominently
in Kansas exports to Japan. The combined totals of food
manufacturing ($582 million) and agricultural crops
($297 million) amount to almost 81 percent of the exports
from Kansas to Japan (KDOC 2002a). In 1999, Japan’s
share of Kansas’ total exports of crops and processed
foods was about 39 percent. In 2002, this percentage
had remained steady, at about 40 percent. Thus, while
exports from Kansas to Japan declined slightly from
2001 to 2002, the importance of Japan as an export market
for Kansas agricultural products has not diminished
since 1999.
Kansas Exports to Japan—Kansas
Export Statistics are evidence of the strong economic
connection between Japan and Kansas. In 2002, Japan
accounted for 18.8 percent of all exports from Kansas.
The value of exports to Japan rose from US$948 million
in 1999 to almost US$1.2 billion in 2001 (KDOC 2002a).
Kansas–Japan Beef Trade—Kansas
beef exports to Japan during the past few years have
been consistent with the pattern of beef exports to
Japan from the United States as a whole. Kansas beef
exports to Japan peaked in 2000 at over US$412 million.
After the BSE scare in late 2001, Kansas beef shipments
to Japan dropped by over 17 percent in 2001 and by another
nearly 30 percent in 2002. Year-to-date figures for
2003, however, show an increase of over 22 percent (MISER).
Chilled and frozen boneless beef were the two largest
commodity groups exported to Japan in 1999, accounting
for nearly 82 percent by value of all Kansas beef exports
to Japan that year. Muscle meat, both chilled and frozen,
has continued to dominate Kansas beef exports to Japan,
but variety meats, particularly frozen tongue and frozen
offal, are also exported from Kansas to Japan in significant
amounts. Frozen tongue shipments in 2001, for example,
totaled over US$49 million (MISER).
Several companies process beef in Kansas for export
to Japan. Excel's plant in Dodge City, for example,
tailors products for Japan with specific cuts and packaging.
The boxed beef is loaded into refrigerated containers
and trucked to the west coast for shipment to Japan.
In Japan, Excel markets beef via Daiei Inc., a large
meat importer. According to Excel, doing business in
Japan “means special cuts of beef and pork that
meet the exact requirements of the Japanese market.
Our plants in Colorado and Kansas package sirloin steaks,
chuck roll and tenderloin under the ‘Kansas beef’
label for Daiei supermarkets, Japan’s largest
retailer. ‘Spencer 86’ and Excel’s
premium brand, ‘Sterling Silver,’ are other
favorites in Japan” (Excel 11-12).
In addition to the marketing activities of private
corporations, as well as the efforts of the federal
government and national trade organizations such as
USMEF, the Kansas Department of Commerce (KDOC) has
been active in developing connections between the state’s
beef industry and Japan. On a 2002 trip to Japan, Governor
Bill Graves met with Japanese restaurant and store owners
and, assisted by the KDOC, hosted thirteen Japanese
beef industry representatives at a Tokyo steakhouse
that features Kansas beef. The KDOC representatives
were joined by the CEO of U.S. Premium Beef and the
president of Farmland National Beef Japan, Inc. to discuss
issues of beef safety and quality (KDOC 2002b:3).
Nancy Kassebaum Baker, former Senator from Kansas,
has also promoted Kansas beef in Japan as wife of the
American Ambassador to Japan, Howard Baker. Earlier
this year, she promoted beef in Tokyo by preparing American-style
tables that held roasts and pot pies. She acknowledged
that having a ranch in Kansas with 300 head of cattle
made her “a little partial” to beef (Associated
Press 2003a). |